Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg128687] Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski at gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 03:48:55 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20121112080708.39931690E@smc.vnet.net> <email@example.com> <20121114062826.C02FC69AC@smc.vnet.net> <6F6D7B27-201F-4AC9-9553-809ABA30A7CE@mimuw.edu.pl> <9488D537-DAE3-45F6-A088-38486CB999AB@math.umass.edu> <20121115085735.202336A1D@smc.vnet.net> <3AA0624E-54D6-4BBD-8320-A47ED2838A75@mimuw.edu.pl> <35B2F1DE-B13C-46E1-A273-411A927047B8@math.umass.edu> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <50A60448.email@example.com> <B90DECA4-63E5-4BFC-B61D-2C9FC259BEDE@gmail.com>
On 16 Nov 2012, at 15:57, Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski at gmail.com> wrote: > The intent of Mathematica developers is certainly that everything that one can do should be documented, which does, of course, exclude the possibility that some undocumented features may work - but when you use them "you are on your own". Before certain tedious nitpickers jump at this opportunity I hasten to point out that a "not" disappeared form the above statement, which should have read: "which does not, of course, exclude the possibility that some undocumented features may work=85" Andrzej Kozlowski