Re: Getting the Derivative of an HoldForm Expression
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg127925] Re: Getting the Derivative of an HoldForm Expression
- From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 04:33:42 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
On 31/08/2012 09:01, nitgun at gmail.com wrote:
> Thank you very much. I'll keep this in mind and start to forget about HoldForm.
Remember that HoldForm is very useful in the right circumstances. It is
useful to show expressions that are deliberately left unvevaluated -
In other contexts where an expression needs to be held, Hold is
preferable because it is visible.
Prev by Date:
Re: Command Possible?
Next by Date:
Re: Mathematica Prove[...] Command Possible?
Previous by thread:
Re: split the sublists into parts according to some rules
Next by thread:
Re: How to create links or bookmarks to jump to sections inside a notebook