[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Command Possible?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg127968] Re: Command Possible?
*From*: magma <maderri2 at gmail.com>
*Date*: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 04:13:34 -0400 (EDT)
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
*References*: <20120901062806.D256E6872@smc.vnet.net> <k21kjc$9vs$1@smc.vnet.net>
> I have read that Russell and Whitehead's Principia Mathematica occupies
> itself for a thousand pages to prove that 1+1=2 (see, eg.,http://blog.plover.com/math/PM.html).
Pfew.. that nothing! Stephen Wolfram in 2002 published a 1300 page
tome "A new kind of science" trying to prove...hem...what was it that
he tried to prove? :-)
I am joking of course! The NKS book is fantastic and well worth
studying. You can now read it online for free, but I still enjoy my
splendidly crafted printed version.
Also, the Principia is indeed a large 3 volume opus, but the 1+1=2
proof is relatively short as you can see here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principia_Mathematica#Quotations
The proof in Theorema that 1+1=2 is fully automatic (once you write
the axioms of arithmetic), is short and quite readable.
Prev by Date:
**Clustering**
Next by Date:
**Integrate yields complex results**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Command Possible?**
Next by thread:
**Re: Mathematica Prove[...] Command Possible?**
| |