Re: A new FrontEnd

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg127975] Re: A new FrontEnd*From*: Tomas Garza <tgarza10 at msn.com>*Date*: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 04:15:55 -0400 (EDT)*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net*References*: <k21kj2$9vq$1@smc.vnet.net>

Well, as for point 3, this is not too unfriendly, is it? Manipulate[ Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 10}, PlotLabel -> Row[{Spacer[position], Style["Test", size]}]], {{position, 0}, 0, 250, 5}, {{size, 10}, 10, 25}] -Tomas > From: rodrigomurtax at gmail.com > Subject: Re: A new FrontEnd > To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net > Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 03:07:29 -0400 > > Point that Wolfram could improve. > 1- More Undo! (1 Undo is a shame) > 2- A decent debugger (don't tell me to use Workbench, I don't want to lose my 2D interface). > 3- Riches graphics pallet. (Try to plot Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 10}, PlotLabel -> "Test"], and change the label position or size..!.. it isn't friendly) > > On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 6:47:54 AM UTC-3, psycho_dad wrote: > > No thank you, I prefer Mathematica the way it is for many reasons: > > > > 1) New interfaces tend to have bugs and with Wolfram's history of dealing with bugs it might take a couple of versions to fix them all. > > > > 2) There might be incompatibility issues with older code. I routinely use code I wrote back in 2005 and it still works. > > > > 3) The FrontEnd in Mathematica 8 is *not* archaic but it's just perfect for what's supposed to be, ie a notebook interface. > > > > 4) If something ain't broke, don't fix it! > > > > > > > > However, now that I think about it, I would indeed like tabs instead of separate windows for my notebooks. > > > > > > > > Cheers >