MathGroup Archive 2012

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: How to simplify certain covariance expressions using

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg128039] Re: How to simplify certain covariance expressions using
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr357 at gmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 04:06:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20120909213324.167C06765@smc.vnet.net>

You cannot run variable names together. Multiplication needs a space
or an explicit *

cov = (ea + ex) (ea + ey);


Assuming[ex*ey == 0, Simplify[cov]]

ea (ea + ex + ey)


Simplify[cov, Assumptions -> ex*ey == 0]

ea (ea + ex + ey)


Or more compactly,

Simplify[cov, ex*ey == 0]

ea (ea + ex + ey)


Or by replacement,

(cov // Expand) /. ex*ey -> 0

ea^2 + ea*ex + ea*ey


Bob Hanlon


On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:33 PM,  <hewei2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>   I have a certain case of covariance to simplify.
>
> Suppose I have the following expression:
> cov=(ea+ex)(ea+ey)=eaea+eaex+eaey+exey
>
> How can I assume that whenever ex times ey ,the product is 0, so that the expression I want to get out of is
>
> Assuming[exey=0,Refine[cov]]=eaea+eaex+eaey
> So that the last term:exey, drops out.
>
> My problem is that the Assuming[] function won't take exey=0 as a valid assumption. Is there any way to do this using some other function or I typed something wrong?
>



  • Prev by Date: Re: How to simplify certain covariance expressions using
  • Next by Date: Re: How on Earth?
  • Previous by thread: Re: How to simplify certain covariance expressions using
  • Next by thread: Re: DiagramPlot and PlanarGraphPlot colors