|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Problem with SetDelayed lhs:=rhs
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg128262] Re: Problem with SetDelayed lhs:=rhs
- From: Bill Rowe <readnews at sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:08:57 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
On 9/29/12 at 2:56 AM, zahava.ginny at gmail.com wrote:
>An assignment using SetDelayed, lhs := rhs, maintains rhs in
>completely unevaluated form. Thus, if k=5, say, the assignment
>In[1] = f[k,j_]:=rhs[k,j]
You want to define f as
f[k_,j_]:= rhs[k,j]
That is you failed to include and underscore following k That is
In[1]:= f[k_, j_] := rhs[k, j]
In[2]:= f[5, j]
Out[2]= rhs(5,j)
However with your definition you could do:
In[3]:= Clear[f];
f[k, j_] := rhs[k, j]
In[5]:= k = 5;
f[k, j]
Out[6]= f(5,j)
Prev by Date:
Re: How to lock down a Dynamic object in a report
Next by Date:
Re: Clearing all variables and definitions: i.e. "resetting" mathematica
Previous by thread:
Re: Problem with SetDelayed lhs:=rhs
Next by thread:
How to lock down a Dynamic object in a report
|