Re: Issues with Rendering of Graphics[]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg130322] Re: Issues with Rendering of Graphics[]
- From: tim_b <tim_brock20 at hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 04:07:22 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <kgmn7q$8gn$1@smc.vnet.net> <khmb7g$nda$1@smc.vnet.net>
Thanks. My trial has expired so I'm not in a position at the minute to experiment any more. If this position changes at some point I will have another go. Cheers Tim On Monday, April 1, 2013 5:56:43 AM UTC+1, debguy wrote: > Hi. I use a previous version, Mathematica 4.0 and it does the same thing. > > It's not "a bug". > > > > Rectangle is a "baked" 2D ~Graphics~ function and can put graphics > > inside the fill area and use Scaled and Offset to. Neat! But it's > > done internal you can't get at / get it to give you a list of drawing > > primitives it finally uses. (as opposed to Plot3D where you can get a > > list of Poly if you want). > > > > Maybe just shorten your Lines? Or use the baked feature: fill the > > Rect with your lines and that should line up nicely. > > > > You should used filled Polygon unless you want to deal with these > > "baked polygon" unknowable boder allowance issues. Soon as you get it > > to work by mending it one way you'll find out some other important > > thing Mathematica supports changes it in another way. You know?