Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Issues with Rendering of Graphics[]

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg130322] Re: Issues with Rendering of Graphics[]
  • From: tim_b <tim_brock20 at hotmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 04:07:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <kgmn7q$8gn$1@smc.vnet.net> <khmb7g$nda$1@smc.vnet.net>

Thanks.
My trial has expired so I'm not in a position at the minute to experiment any more. If this position changes at some point I will have another go.

Cheers
Tim 



On Monday, April 1, 2013 5:56:43 AM UTC+1, debguy wrote:
> Hi.  I use a previous version, Mathematica 4.0 and it does the same thing.
> 
> It's not "a bug".
> 
> 
> 
> Rectangle is a "baked" 2D ~Graphics~ function and can put graphics
> 
> inside the fill area and use Scaled and Offset to.  Neat!  But it's
> 
> done internal you can't get at / get it to give you a list of drawing
> 
> primitives it finally uses. (as opposed to Plot3D where you can get a
> 
> list of Poly if you want).
> 
> 
> 
> Maybe just shorten your Lines?  Or use the baked feature: fill the
> 
> Rect with your lines and that should line up nicely.
> 
> 
> 
> You should used filled Polygon unless you want to deal with these
> 
> "baked polygon" unknowable boder allowance issues.  Soon as you get it
> 
> to work by mending it one way you'll find out some other important
> 
> thing Mathematica supports changes it in another way.  You know?




  • Prev by Date: Re: Mathematica and Lisp
  • Next by Date: Re: what is wrong with this code?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica and Lisp
  • Next by thread: Re: Splice fails (Mathematica 9; Windows)