MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Mathematica and Lisp

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg129660] Re: Mathematica and Lisp
  • From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
  • Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 02:47:23 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <kcqkv4$lq5$1@smc.vnet.net> <kct7fj$sgo$1@smc.vnet.net> <kef6pb$k9a$1@smc.vnet.net> <keiau5$qqi$1@smc.vnet.net>

On 02/02/2013 06:15, Richard Fateman wrote:

>>> (RJF)  If I were using a computer to do something that required correct answers
>>> for, say, life safety, like building a bridge, I would follow WRI's
>>> advice and not use Mathematica.
>>

I'd love to know what software you would use, if you wanted to do a 
complex calculation of the type we are talking about. What software 
would meet your standards?

David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk




  • Prev by Date: Real time progress of NDSolve
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica and Lisp
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica and Lisp
  • Next by thread: Re: Mathematica and Lisp