|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Mathematica and Lisp
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg129660] Re: Mathematica and Lisp
- From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 02:47:23 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <kcqkv4$lq5$1@smc.vnet.net> <kct7fj$sgo$1@smc.vnet.net> <kef6pb$k9a$1@smc.vnet.net> <keiau5$qqi$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 02/02/2013 06:15, Richard Fateman wrote:
>>> (RJF) If I were using a computer to do something that required correct answers
>>> for, say, life safety, like building a bridge, I would follow WRI's
>>> advice and not use Mathematica.
>>
I'd love to know what software you would use, if you wanted to do a
complex calculation of the type we are talking about. What software
would meet your standards?
David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk
Prev by Date:
Real time progress of NDSolve
Next by Date:
Re: Mathematica and Lisp
Previous by thread:
Re: Mathematica and Lisp
Next by thread:
Re: Mathematica and Lisp
|