[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Help with "recession bar" graph

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg129758] Re: Help with "recession bar" graph
• From: Alan <alan.isaac at gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 04:36:52 -0500 (EST)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
• References: <bvd8kg$5ca$1@smc.vnet.net> <20130208101218.5682C6934@smc.vnet.net>

On Sunday, February 10, 2013 3:35:37 AM UTC-5, djmpark wrote:
> With the Show statement Mathematica picks up the Options from the first plot
> in the Show statement and they override Options from subsequent plots. This
> doesn't make a lot of sense and confuses many users. So, for example, if you
> had an Epilog Option in the second plot that logically went with the second
> plot, you would have to shift it to the first plot. However, you can also
> put Options at the end of the Show statement and these take precedence.


The suggestion to move the Epilog/Prolog to the first plot is helpful.  Still, after all this discussion, I am inclined to say that comparison with the simplicity of mpl's axvline suggests that there is a missing feature in Mathematica: perhaps, a keyword for Rectangle coordinates to get the full graph extent. In economics and finance graphs, this is a very common need.

Thanks!

• References:
  • Re: Help with "recession bar" graph
    • From: Alan <alan.isaac@gmail.com>