|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Can you profile compiled code?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg129525] Re: Can you profile compiled code?
- From: Szabolcs HorvÃt <szhorvat at gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:22:28 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <kdddio$a1b$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 2013-01-19 06:13:44 +0000, samid.hoda at gmail.com said:
> I am trying to profile some compiled code using Workbench but I don't
> seem to be able to get any timing data for the lines inside my compiled
> function. Do I need to set an option or will Profile[] automatically
> generate data for the compiled function?
>
> I apologize if there is a readily available source that answers my
> question (I Googled and looked through the Workbench documentation),
> but I couldn't find one.
I am not aware of any way to profile the innards of a byte-code
compiled function (which doesn't mean that there ins't a wayâ?¦)
But if you compile to C (not byte code), technically yo could use a
profiler for C to get some information about what needs to be sped up.
I expect it'll take some work to figure out how to profile such a
function effectively, as the code is generated and loaded into the
kernel by default. You could split the function off and call it from a
separate program (not the kernel) to profile it more easily. I have
never done this personally.
Prev by Date:
Re: Needing a Random List of Non-repeating Values whose
Next by Date:
Re: Saving mov in v9
Previous by thread:
Can you profile compiled code?
Next by thread:
Solid State Disk to boost Mathematica performance
|