Re: Rookie questions about solving for small numbers and

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg131031] Re: Rookie questions about solving for small numbers and*From*: Ray Koopman <koopman at sfu.ca>*Date*: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 06:01:30 -0400 (EDT)*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com*Delivered-to*: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net*Delivered-to*: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net

Please repost, saying how the strings "=1B$B&R=1B(B" and "=1B$B!g=1B(B" should be read, and what random variable is supposed to have a 10^-5 chance of exceeding 1. ----- Samuel Mark Young <sy81 at sussex.ac.uk> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to solve a problem involving various integrals. Essentially, I'm perturbing a gaussian distribution, and then trying to find a value for sigma (the standard deviation) for which there is a 10^-5 chance of being greater than 1 (i.e. What value of sigma gives a value of 10^-5 when the pdf is integrated from 1 to infinity). The aim is to find how sigma changes with the different perturbations. The code below is a shortened version of what I'm currently using - you may not need to know all the relevant details. > > > Explanation: Here I'm adding a quadratic perturbation with coefficient f to the Gaussian variable x to make a new variable zeta. The aim here is to plot a graph (eventually) showing how sigma changes with f. Because I want to use this code to work with higher order equations (for which there is no analytic solution), I use a temporary value for sigma (=1B$B&R=1B(Btemp - provided that the value of sigma found is close to =1B$B&R=1B(Btemp, this works well) and solve numerically. Similarly, the easiest way to handle the in tegrations is just to find the relevant values of x for which zeta>1, and integrate the Gaussian distribution over those values. I then use FindRoot to find a value of sigma which satisfies the equation. > > > f = 0.5; > > =1B$B&R=1B(Btemp = 0.2; The values here have been picked arbitrarily > > > zeta = x + f (x^2 - =1B$B&R=1B(B^2); > xCritical = x /. NSolve[1 == zeta /. =1B$B&R=1B(B -> =1B$B&R=1B(Btemp, x, Reals]; > yCritical = xCritical/=1B$B&R=1B(B; This calculates the critical values to integrate between > > > =1B$B&R=1B(Btemp = =1B$B&R=1B(B /. > FindRoot[ > > Sum[(1/ > Sqrt[2*Pi]) (If[(Abs[D[zeta, x]] /. x -> xCritical[[n]]) > > 0, If[(D[zeta, x] /. x -> xCritical[[n]]) > 0, 1, -1], > 0]) (Integrate[Exp[-(y^2)/2], {y, yCritical[[n]], =1B$B!g=1B(B}]), {n, > Length[xCritical]}] The Sum[] command generates a series of ERFC's (this code will throw up errors for certain values of f, but the full code doesn't) > > > + If[(Simplify[D[zeta, x] /. x -> xCritical[[1]]]) < 0, 1, 0] = 10^(-5), {=1B$B&R=1B(B, 0.00001, 2}] FindRoot searches for a value of sigma between 0 and 2 (the solution should always lie in this range - though putting in zero exactly results in divide by zero errors > > > There are currently 3 problems I'm having: > > 1) Underflow occurs in the computation a lot for certain values of f > > 2) I want to be able to solve for when the integrals equal 10^-20 (as oppos= > e to 10^-5) - which is greater than machine precision. I've tried fiddling = > with settings like AccuracyGoal, PrecisionGoal and WorkingPrecision but can= > 't find anything that makes it work reliably (instead of a smooth curve, I = > end up with jagged spikes. Its entirely possible, even likely, that I'm mis= > sing something obvious. > > 3) For negative values of f, there are no solutions to x + f (x^2 - =1B$B&= > R=1B(Btemp^2)=1 if =1B$B&R=1B(Btemp is too small. The problem then, is th= > at, when =1B$B&R=1B(Btemp is increased, unless there is remarkable fine tun= > ing, the final value of sigma found is not similar to =1B$B&R=1B(Btemp. The= > only way I've found to handle this is to very slowly increment =1B$B&R=1B(= > Btemp until there are real solutions, then use FindRoot to find a value for= > sigma, and compare sigma to =1B$B&R=1B(Btemp to see if they match (to 4 s.= > f. is fine). However, this takes a very long time when I want to do this re= > peatedly. > > > > Many thanks in advance for taking the time to read this, and any help is ve= > ry well appreciated. I think I have included all the information needed, bu= > t please ask if you need more. Please feel free to contact me directly at s= > y81 at sussex.ac.uk with any questions. > > > Regards, > > Sam Young

**Re: Warsaw Univ. course, was Re: Work on Basic Mathematica Stephen!**

**Adding value to some elements of a list**

**Re: Interval vs default, was Re: Mathematica numerics and... Re: Applying**

**Adding value to some elements of a list**