MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: BitAnd[True,False]

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg131739] Re: BitAnd[True,False]
  • From: Alan G Isaac <alan.isaac at>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:44:04 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to:
  • Delivered-to:
  • Delivered-to:
  • Delivered-to:
  • References: <> <>

On 9/25/2013 4:24 AM, John Fultz wrote:
> I'm not sure why you might have expected this to work. It
> wouldn't occur to me at all that bitwise operations would
> have anything to do with logical truth tables (unless
> those tables were expressed in values of 0 and 1).

Not expect, but rather hope.  And why?
Because I would hope bitwise operations would treat
True and False like 1 and 0. (E.g., in Python, True
and False behave this way, since bool is a subtype
of int.)

Let me put it this way:
what else might one intend by BitAnd[True,False]?

To AND values in two binary (True,False) matrices,
I think we must do something like:
MapThread[And, {m1, m2}, 2]
Being able to just BitAnd[m1,m2] would be nicer.

But in any case, thank you for the helpful
explanation of the behavior that puzzled me.

Alan Isaac

  • Prev by Date: Re: Quantity
  • Next by Date: Re: BitAnd[True,False]
  • Previous by thread: Re: BitAnd[True,False]
  • Next by thread: Re: BitAnd[True,False]