Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2014

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: For 2014?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg132156] Re: For 2014?
  • From: carlson at wolfram.com
  • Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 02:30:14 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20131224071749.C3F1A69D5@smc.vnet.net> <3688DC0E-CE14-47F1-B93B-5BFA875C59E3@data2knowledge.de> <20131226112449.4994F6A09@smc.vnet.net> <644455E9-F8F1-491C-9EFE-1198A90B8FED@wolfram.com> <6A7FA90C-2EC8-4A73-82FC-C142B56D66DD@data2knowledge.de>

On Dec 29, 2013, at 6:40 AM, Ulrich Arndt <ulrich.arndt at data2knowledge.de> wrote:

> Thanks for sharing. Was obviously not aware of this.
> Here a tweet conform code e.g. 139 chars - output could be nicer but 140 is a strong limitation given the long function names...
>
> 
l=Range[9];r=StringJoin[Riffle[ToString/@l,#]]&/@Tuples[{"+","-","*"," /",""},8];Grid[{#,Extract[r,Position[ToExpression/@r,#]]}&/@(l+2010)]
>
> Ulrich

Nice!

Chris




  • Prev by Date: Running problem in DSolve
  • Next by Date: Avoid iteration in pattern test?
  • Previous by thread: Re: For 2014?
  • Next by thread: Re: For 2014?