Services & ResourcesWolfram ForumsMathGroup Archive

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: For 2014?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg132185] Re: For 2014?
• From: Boguś <telemorele at wp.pl>
• Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:32:03 -0500 (EST)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
• References: <20131224071749.C3F1A69D5@smc.vnet.net> <3688DC0E-CE14-47F1-B93B-5BFA875C59E3@data2knowledge.de> <20131226112449.4994F6A09@smc.vnet.net> <644455E9-F8F1-491C-9EFE-1198A90B8FED@wolfram.com> <la606o$faj$1@smc.vnet.net> <20140107075437.D0DF569ED@smc.vnet.net> <lao80v$pmm$1@smc.vnet.net>

Ulrich Arndt  wrote:
> Yes, this is much faster - 5 times on my machine.
> Problem is that we get 141 chars even if we replace the re by b ;-).
>
> But can someone explain the reason for the huge processing time difference?
>
> Ulrich
>

 
l=Range[9];r=StringJoin[Riffle[ToString/@l,#]]&/@Tuples[{"+","-","*","/",""},8];Grid[{#,Extract[r,Position[ToExpression/@r,#]]}&/@(l+2010)]

Position[ToExpression/@r,#]
            ^^^^^ This is the slowest process. 9 times repeated

-- 
  Costa

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: For 2014?
    • From: Ulrich Arndt <ulrich.arndt@data2knowledge.de>

• References:
  • Re: For 2014?
    • From: Costa Bravo <q13a27tt@aol.com>