MathGroup Archive 2014

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: For 2014?

Ulrich Arndt  wrote:
> Yes, this is much faster - 5 times on my machine.
> Problem is that we get 141 chars even if we replace the re by b ;-).
> But can someone explain the reason for the huge processing time difference?
> Ulrich


            ^^^^^ This is the slowest process. 9 times repeated


  • Prev by Date: Re: Compact formulation of array of constraints
  • Next by Date: Re: Number Interpretation
  • Previous by thread: Re: For 2014?
  • Next by thread: Re: For 2014?