       Re: limits on symbol eigenvalues?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg132717] Re: limits on symbol eigenvalues?
• From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
• Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 00:44:03 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
• Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
• References: <c9pei6\$qgr\$1@smc.vnet.net>

```On 04/06/2004 10:14, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just  started  using mathematica.  When  I tried  to calculate   the
> symbolic eigenvalues of a 16x16 matrix mathematica told me it couldn't
>
> Is there a restriction?
>
> Thanks
>
> Uwe Brauer
>
Not every symbolic problem that you can pose has a symbolic solution.
For example, some symbolic integrals don't have symbolic solutions -
likewise for differential equations.

A symbolic eigenvalue problem of order N involves solving an N'th order
polynomial equation. Specific cases can be solved, but the general case
cannot be solved for N>=5. This restriction can in theory be relaxed (I
am not sure by how much) by the use of theta functions, though the

Even when a symbolic solution is possible, it may not be desirable
because it is excessively complicated, and possibly numerically unstable
if the coefficients are subsequently replaced by numbers. To see what I
mean, try evaluating:

Solve[a x^4 + b x^3 + c x + d == 0, x]

David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Numerical solution from Module
• Next by Date: Re: mathematica modify code like?
• Previous by thread: Re: limits on symbol eigenvalues?
• Next by thread: Re: Period of numerically defined function