MathGroup Archive 1995

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Deleting more subtle then Clear[ ] ?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg2234] Deleting more subtle then Clear[ ] ?
  • From: alfred at ca-risc.co.at
  • Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 01:53:14 -0400
  • Organization: EUnet EDV DienstleistungsgesmbH, Wien

Well,
	Let's assume we have a function f[x,y,z] where x and y are VERY big or  
time consuming lists of numbers or functions.
	By defining f[x_,y_,z_]:= f[x,y,z] =   I make MMA remember what it did.  
How can I now tell it to disremember for all f[x,*,*] when I specifically want  
it to reprocess whatever is dependend on x (i.e. the contents of the file has  
changed but the name is the same) but NOT on y?

Thanks for help

Alfred
--
================================                                         
Alfred H. Corrodi		"Capitalism is based on the assumption 
Risk Manager			 that you can win the game. Communism  	
Creditanstalt-Bankverein	 is based on the assumption that you can
alfred at ca-risc.co.at (NeXT)	 break even. Mysticism is based on the
Tel/43/1/531311967 Fax/5337341   assumption that you can leave the game."


  • Prev by Date: Re: A simple swap function
  • Next by Date: large expressions
  • Previous by thread: Re: Deleting more subtle then Clear[ ] ?
  • Next by thread: Re: Deleting more subtle then Clear[ ] ?