Abs derivative (was Re: ? ? ? ! ?)

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg8310] Abs derivative (was Re: [mg8223] ? ? ? ! ?)
• From: Olivier Gerard <jacquesg at pratique.fr>
• Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 13:24:27 -0400
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Original message

> Can anyone explain what v3.0 of Mathematica thinks it's doing when it
> executes
>
>      Plot[Abs'[x], {x, -3/10, 3/10}]
>
> ???
>
> Note the prime:  The first argument of Plot was Abs'[x], not Abs[x].
>
> The strange behavior I see appears both on a PowerMac 7200/120 running
> Mac OS 7.5.3 and on a Wintel box running Windoze 95, so I presume that
> it isn't platform dependent--or at least, not fully so.
>
> --Lou Talman

It seems that, having no special rules to differentiate
Abs (a process which usually gives Sign[x] with a problem at 0)
it is using a standard numerical interpolation of the derivative.
The graphics shows that it uses the same sample points for this interpolation
regardless of the number of PlotPoints you ask for: they are 0.05 apart
so the interval you have chosen shows well the relaxation of the
approximation. But if you ask for say

>      Plot[Abs'[3 x], {x, -3/10, 3/10}]

it uses points 3 times closer.

Well, Lou that's funny and a bit sad. An entry like this could have
been foreseen in the Abs code.
This is easy to fix it by adding new rules to Abs.

Doing it Quick and Dirty:

Unprotect[Abs]; Derivative[1][Abs] ^:= Sign ; Protect[Abs];

After that, the plots are correct.

This solution assume a convention: Abs'[0]=0 which is sensible
in some cases but not always as formally the function has not
one derivative but two limits.

In fact this solution also causes Limit[ Abs'[x], x->0]

Prior to this modification,
Limit[ Abs'[x], x->0]  gives Abs'[0] with Analytic->True
and nothing with default Analytic->False.

After this modification
Limit[ Abs'[x], x->0]  gives 0 with Analytic->True
and 1 or -1 with default Analytic->False depending on the Direction Option.

Olivier Gerard

```

• Prev by Date: goofy html
• Next by Date: Truth tables?
• Previous by thread: Re: goofy html
• Next by thread: Truth tables?