Re: Using Block instead of Module?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg24265] Re: Using Block instead of Module?
- From: "Rasmus Debitsch" <debitsch at Zeiss.de>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 23:10:46 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Customer of UUNET Deutschland GmbH
- References: <8jtf5f$ik5@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hello,
outputTest[
lst_List,
id_Integer] := Module[{
fname,
tmp = lst
},
fname = ToString[id] <> ".txt";
Put[tmp, fname];
];
does the job.
Regards
--
Rasmus Debitsch
Carl Zeiss Lithos GmbH
Carl Zeiss Strasse
D-73447 Oberkochen
eMail : debitsch at zeiss.de
Wen-Feng Hsiao <d8442803 at student.nsysu.edu.tw> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
8jtf5f$ik5 at smc.vnet.net...
> Dear listers,
>
> I try to output results to a file whose name is variable, and find Module
> statement cannot fulfill this purpose, only Block can do. For example,
>
> outputTest[lst_List, id_Integer] := Module[{fname, tmp = lst},
> fname = ToString[id] <> ".txt";
> ToExpression["tmp >>" <> fname];
> ];
>
> outputTest[{1, 2, 3}, 3]
>
> The output file is 3.txt, but the content is "tmp". But if I change
> Module statement into Block as below:
>
> outputTest[lst_List, id_Integer] := Block[{fname, tmp = lst},
> fname = ToString[id] <> ".txt";
> ToExpression["tmp >>" <> fname];
> ];
>
> outputTest[{1, 2, 3}, 3]
>
> The output file is 3.txt, and the content is correct, {1, 2, 3}. How if
> one used to use Module, like me, should do for the same purpose?
>
> Wen-Feng
>
>