Re: Q: Is there an "inverse" of ToRules?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg31058] Re: [mg31038] Q: Is there an "inverse" of ToRules?
- From: BobHanlon at aol.com
- Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 03:32:28 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In a message dated 2001/10/5 1:48:07 AM, mcoleman at bondspace.com writes:
>Is there an "inverse" to the ToRules function? That is, a function
>that converts rules to equations (expressed in == form), which could
>then be used in the Solve function?
>
{a -> b, c -> d, e -> f} /.
(x_ -> y_) :> (x == y)
{a == b, c == d, e == f}
Bob Hanlon
Chantilly, VA USA