MathGroup Archive 2003

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: A FullSimplify Problem

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg41175] Re: A FullSimplify Problem
  • From: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
  • Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 06:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: The University of Western Australia
  • References: <b8qolv$840$1@smc.vnet.net> <b8t8qm$ep6$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

In article <b8t8qm$ep6$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
 "Dr. Wolfgang Hintze" <weh at snafu.de> wrote:

> When I plot the integrand between 0 and Pi it also looks like the 
> integral being zero.
> 
> Performing NIntegrate (and specifying a numerically, e.g. a=0.4) on the 
> original integrand leads to an error message claiming a spurious 
> "strongly oscillating function". But by splitting the interval into 
> {0,Pi/2} and {Pi/2,Pi} NIntegrate behaves well and gives opposite 
> results for both parts. Hence the complete integral vanishes again.

For -1 < a < 1 but not for Abs[a] > 1.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 
Paul Abbott                                   Phone: +61 8 9380 2734
School of Physics, M013                         Fax: +61 8 9380 1014
The University of Western Australia      (CRICOS Provider No 00126G)         
35 Stirling Highway
Crawley WA 6009                      mailto:paul at physics.uwa.edu.au 
AUSTRALIA                            http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~paul



  • Prev by Date: Re: Wrong partial derivatives calculated
  • Next by Date: Re: Wrong partial derivatives calculated
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: A FullSimplify Problem
  • Next by thread: Re: A FullSimplify Problem