Re: Re: solve output "problem"
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg59181] Re: [mg59161] Re: solve output "problem"
- From: Curtis Osterhoudt <gardyloo at mail.wsu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 01:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <dc76fj$jrc$1@smc.vnet.net> <200507310530.BAA08015@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Although it's not nearly so good as a symbolic solution, you could form
a list of roots (as found with NSolve or maybe RootSearch) with several
changes in each parameter, while keeping the others constant. Sometimes
you can find an analytic behavior based on the behaviour of the numeric
solutions as parameters are changed.
Curtis O.
Selina wrote:
>Actually, I was looking for a way to get a symbolic representation of the roots which I could then see how they change with respect to some parameters, so NSolve wasn't my first choice. But I guess I'll have to resort to that.
>
>Thank you to all who have replied.
>
>
>
>