MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: when dimension increases

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg67567] Re: when dimension increases
  • From: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
  • Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 05:11:44 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <e82n4s$qvr$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi,
you can still use Map and Sort, but you have to tell Map on which level 
to apply Sort. E.g.:
Map[Sort,listNew1,Depth[listNew1]-2]
or
Map[Sort,listNew1,{Depth[listNew1]-2}]
depending on which levels you want to sort.
Daniel

Arkadiusz Majka wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Imagine that I want to sort (or do anything else) a list
> 
> list={5,2,8,3}
> 
> So I use Sort[list]
> 
> Next I add next dimension and obtain a list listNew=Table[list,{5}]
> 
> In order to sort all sublists of it  it I use Map[Sort, listNew]
> 
> Now I add another more dimension listNew1=Table[list, {3},{5}]
> 
> I can again sort all sublists of it using combination of Table and Map.
> 
> The question is the following:
> 
> How can I deal with expresions of unknown a priori dimension? For
> example what is the most elegant (clear and fast) method of sorting all
> sublists of multidimensional expresion? I would like to avoid Table and
> unclear expresions with many "Maps" (one embeded in another).
> 
> Thanks for your help,
> 
> Arek
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: when dimension increases
  • Next by Date: Re: Forcing a parameter to be integer when using 'Integrate'
  • Previous by thread: Re: when dimension increases
  • Next by thread: Re: when dimension increases