Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg76796] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: rip pelletier <bitbucket at comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 05:05:03 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <f21e5e$6e7$1@smc.vnet.net> <f38qk4$hrc$1@smc.vnet.net>
In article <f38qk4$hrc$1 at smc.vnet.net>, dimitris <dimmechan at yahoo.com>
wrote:
hi dimitris,
thanks for the suggestion, but GraphicsGrid is extremely simple and does
exactly what i want.
vale,
rip
> I think the following was not mentioned.
>
> Since you are interested in putting two graphs side by side what is
> bad with the following
>
> In[73]:=
> Block[{$DisplayFunction = Identity}, g1 = Plot[o^(1/2), {o, 1, 2},
> PlotStyle -> Red];
> g2 = Plot[Log[o], {o, 1, 2}, PlotStyle -> Blue]; ]
> Show[GraphicsArray[{g1, g2}], ImageSize -> 600]
>
> It works in version 5.2 and I think there will not be any problem in
> version 6. (confirmation needed!)
>
> Dimitris
>
> / rip pelletier :
> > hi,
> >
> > thru 5.2 we could display, for example, 2 graphs side-by-side by using a
> > third argument to Rectangle, the name of a graphics object.
> >
> > 6.0 tells me that i cannot call Rectangle with 3 arguments. (true, it
> > was a bit of a kludge, and in principle i approve of it going away,
> > but....)
> >
> > what is the replacement?
> >
> > thanks,
> > rip
> >
> > --
> > NB eddress is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t
--
NB eddress is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t