Re: Re: Re: Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg101411] Re: [mg101403] Re: [mg101383] Re: [mg101375] Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?
- From: "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:16:24 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <30723579.1246246649561.JavaMail.root@n11> <200907041042.GAA17766@smc.vnet.net> <8682245.1246784181565.JavaMail.root@n11>
And more than once I have referred people to Jens-Peer because he does indeed have a deep knowledge of underlying graphics algorithms and formats - things that I know little about. And more than that, I am always learning things from the many people who participate in MathGroup - from both old-timer gurus and from those posting "simple" questions. David Park djmpark at comcast.net http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/ From: Andrzej Kozlowski [mailto:akoz at mimuw.edu.pl] On 4 Jul 2009, at 19:42, DrMajorBob wrote: > Nor do I. With or without Presentations, Mr. Park knows more about > Mathematica graphics -- and informative graphics in general -- than > the > lot of us. I think one should avoid such generalizations when they concern people other than the person making this sort of statement. I personally do not claim to know much about graphics, but I have in the past used J.P. Kuska's MathGL 3D I would say he does know an awful lot about Mathematica graphics (and graphics in general). Jens' knowledge may be of a different kind from David Parks's knowledge but I can see no grounds at all for dismissing it in such a causal way. Andrzej Kozlowski
- References:
- Re: Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1@austin.rr.com>
- Re: Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?