MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: ImageResolution

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg97822] Re: [mg97778] ImageResolution
  • From: "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net>
  • Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 05:51:06 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <28755811.1237631721904.JavaMail.root@m02>

If you don't like the default ImageMargins, then why not specify them
explicitly?

GraphicsColumn[
 Table[Rasterize[ListPlot[Table[x, {x, -10, 10}], Frame -> True,
    FrameLabel -> {"Not quite", "Hi"},
    ImageMargins -> {{15, 10}, {15, 10}}], 
   ImageResolution -> ir], {ir, {10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500}}]]


David Park
djmpark at comcast.net
http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/  


From: pjw [mailto:Patrick.John.Wheeler at gmail.com] 

I want to output some high resolution graphs, however changing
ImageResolution seems to effect the padding around the Frame label.
Does anyone know or have a solution for this?

The code below demonstrates this problem:

GraphicsColumn[
 Table[Rasterize[
   ListPlot[Table[x, {x, -10, 10}], Frame -> True,
    FrameLabel -> {"Not quite", "Hi"}],
   ImageResolution -> ir], {ir, {10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500}}]]




  • Prev by Date: Re: Online Graphic Output
  • Next by Date: Re: DSolve bug
  • Previous by thread: ImageResolution
  • Next by thread: Commutators with boson operators