MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: atoi equivalents?

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg99407] Re: atoi equivalents?
  • From: Bill Rowe <readnews at>
  • Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:40:52 -0400 (EDT)

On 5/4/09 at 5:59 AM, michael2718 at (Michael) wrote:

>What is the most efficient or recommended way to parse numbers in

>I can use ToExpression["1234"] and it will return the number. But
>this won't do, because I could be scraping un-trusted data and the
>above could lead to an injection of code. I could also use something
>like this: ToExpression[StringCases["1234", x1 : NumberString ~~ ___
>-> x1]] but then I have to add error checking and whatnot. I suppose
>I could write a simple MathLink program which implement atoi, atol,

>All of these solutions seems like a lot of overhead.  Anybody have a
>better idea?

I really don't see a reason for concern when using ToExpression.
Probably, the simplest way to do what you are trying to do would be


If the input string is not a number, this code will generate an
error. There is still some overhead. But, any method used to do
input checking will add overhead.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Bug with Hypergeometric2F1?
  • Next by Date: Re: atoi equivalents?
  • Previous by thread: Re: atoi equivalents?
  • Next by thread: Re: atoi equivalents?