MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: confused about asserting variable is element of

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg103204] Re: [mg103141] Re: confused about asserting variable is element of
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at cox.net>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:22:42 -0400 (EDT)
  • Reply-to: hanlonr at cox.net

It wouldn't have any effect. It just evaluates to False

Element[I, Reals]

False

Simplify[Re[I], Element[I, Reals]]

Simplify::fas: Warning: One or more assumptions evaluated to False. >>

0

Simplify[Im[I], Element[I, Reals]]

Simplify::fas: Warning: One or more assumptions evaluated to False. >>

1


Bob Hanlon

---- AES <siegman at stanford.edu> wrote: 

=============
In article <h859vn$q48$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
 Leonid Shifrin <lshifr at gmail.com> wrote:

> When you enter Element[a, Reals], this by itself does nothing. It does not,
> in particular, change  any global property of symbol <a>.
> 
> However, this expression can be used in
> commands like Simplify, FullSimplify, etc., to give them the information
> that <a> should be considered real (in that particular computation):

So, could one ever write Assumptions -> Element[I, Reals]  in any of 
those commands?



  • Prev by Date: Re: Switching between 32 and 64 bit kernels, licensing?
  • Next by Date: Re: how to solve the integer equation Abs[3^x-2^y]=1
  • Previous by thread: Re: confused about asserting variable is element of
  • Next by thread: Re: confused about asserting variable is element of