Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg114974] Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
- Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 02:33:57 -0500 (EST)
- References: <iepdi9$g2h$1@smc.vnet.net> <201012220736.CAA10472@smc.vnet.net> <iev2go$4j5$1@smc.vnet.net> <201012240911.EAA25794@smc.vnet.net>
On 24 Dec 2010, at 10:11, Armand Tamzarian wrote: > On Dec 23, 7:50 pm, Andrzej Kozlowski <a... at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: >> On 22 Dec 2010, at 08:36, Armand Tamzarian wrote: >> >>> There was a thread recently about the standard of documentation. We >>> appreciate the enormity of the task of documenting functions but in >>> this case Wolfram clearly dropped the ball by including = documentation >>> of functionality that doesn't exist. >> >> Well, given the choice between useful but undocumented features and >> fully documented but non-existent features, I have no doubt about my >> preference. >> >> Andrzej Kozlowski > > > Why frame it as a question of choice? Shouldn't you be aiming to > eliminate both? Both instances tend to waste users time. ...as we > already saw above from a post by Eric Brown. > > Mike > Well, I guess this (sort of) proves that these irritating "emoticons" = are sometimes really needed... Sigh. Andrzej =
- References:
- Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
- From: Armand Tamzarian <mike.honeychurch@gmail.com>
- Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
- From: Armand Tamzarian <mike.honeychurch@gmail.com>
- Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8