MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg106535] Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?
  • From: dh <dh at metrohm.com>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:21:55 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <himsqd$jd0$1@smc.vnet.net>


Hi Dave,

<< does not have a meaning in mathematica. It is only a symbol. 

Therefore your expression is not simplified.

You may define a new operator for your purposes.

Daniel



dbird wrote:

> Please excuse if this has been answered before, but I can't find it.

> 

> Is there some way to do a Simplify with assumptions using a 

> NestedLessLess or something similar? For example:

> 

> d=a+b

> Simplify[d,NestedLessLess[a,b]]

> 

> Answer is:

> a+b

> 

> Answer should be:

> b

> 

> Thanks,

> 

> Dave

> 




  • Prev by Date: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?
  • Next by Date: Re: Plotting a curve on a flat torus
  • Previous by thread: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?
  • Next by thread: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?