MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: A Question About Directive

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg111288] Re: A Question About Directive
  • From: "Kevin J. McCann" <kjm at KevinMcCann.com>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:38:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <i2eadd$q1l$1@smc.vnet.net> <i2gju8$aa$1@smc.vnet.net>

However, is Directive[Red,AbsoluteThickness[2]] really more readable 
than {{Red,AbsoluteThickness[2]}}? I don't think so. Again, this seems 
like very little, even if you prefer the former, for a new function to do.

Kevin

AES wrote:
> In article <i2eadd$q1l$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
>  Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Fewer keystrokes is not the sole metric for simplicity! Code readability 
>> is another.
> 
> Agreed!  
> 
> Wasn't APL the classic example of a language with near-minimum 
> keystrokes, near-maximum unreadability?  -- such that APL programs were 
> sometimes characterized as "write once, read never".
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: mathematica gives strange result
  • Next by Date: NDSolve - how to bypass safety chceck?
  • Previous by thread: Re: A Question About Directive
  • Next by thread: Re: A Question About Directive