MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Conjugate of symbolic expressions

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg108034] Conjugate of symbolic expressions
  • From: Joseph Gwinn <joegwinn at comcast.net>
  • Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 04:01:47 -0500 (EST)

I have been using Mathematica 7 to do the grunt work in solving some 
transmission-line problems, using the exponential form of the equations.  

A typical form would be S1 = Exp[k1*x + I*omega*(t+tau)], describing signal one, 
where K1 is the attenuation in nepers per meter, I is the square root of minus 
one, omega is the angular frequency in radians per second, t is time and tau is 
a fixed time delay, t and tau being in seconds.

Often I need the complex conjugate of S1, so I write Conjugate[S1].  The problem 
is that Mathematica does nothing useful, leaving the explicit Conjugate[] in the 
output expression, which after a very few steps generates a mathematically 
correct but incomprehensible algebraic hairball.

Clearly Mathematica feels that it lack sufficient information to proceed.  In 
particular, it has no way to know that all variables are real until explicitly 
told.

One way to solve this problem is 
FullSimplify[Conjugate[S1],Element[_Symbol,Reals]], and this often works.  

But equally often, it works too well, yielding the trignometric expansion of the 
desired exponential-form answer.  Nor is it clear why it sometimes works and 
sometimes works too well.  

Using Simplify[] instead of FullSimplify[] doesn't seem to work at all. 


So my questions are:

1.  What controls FullSimplify[]'s behaviour here?

2.  What other ways are there to cause Mathematica to apply the Conjugate[] 
without holding back?


Thanks,

Joe Gwinn


  • Prev by Date: Help Improving this integral calculation / solution
  • Next by Date: Re: auto-save in Mathematica
  • Previous by thread: Re: Help Improving this integral calculation / solution
  • Next by thread: Re: Conjugate of symbolic expressions