MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Just another Mathematica "Gotcha"

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg120808] Re: Just another Mathematica "Gotcha"
  • From: "Kevin J. McCann" <kjm at KevinMcCann.com>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 06:49:57 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • References: <j1r5d3$fi4$1@smc.vnet.net>

I think that in the first, Mathematica is applying your rule to Normal, not to 
the output. Put parens around it (Series ...//Normal)/.b2->0 and it works.

Kevin

On 8/9/2011 7:24 AM, AES wrote:
> Seems as if the following two expression should yield the same output
> -- seems that way to me anyway -- but they don't.  I'll hide the
> actual outputs down below so Mathematica gurus (or "ordinary users")
> can make their predictions as to which one does what.
>
> In[1]:= Series[a+(b1+b2)x,{x,0,1}] //Normal /.{b2->0}
>
> In[2]:= Series[a+(b1+b2)x,{x,0,1}] /.{b2->0} //Normal
>
> My conclusions:
>
> 1)  By any normal rules of interpretation or ordinary interpretations
> of these statements, they both should do the same same thing.
>
> 2)  This is just another Mathematica "Gotcha" -- and not a
> particularly forgivable one.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Out[1]= a+(b1+b2) x
>
> Out[2]= a+b1 x
>




  • Prev by Date: Re: Just another Mathematica "Gotcha"
  • Next by Date: Re: Just another Mathematica "Gotcha"
  • Previous by thread: Re: Just another Mathematica "Gotcha"
  • Next by thread: Re: Just another Mathematica "Gotcha"