MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: $MaxNumber

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg117293] Re: $MaxNumber
  • From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 05:59:37 -0500 (EST)

I'm seeing the smaller number here, too, on a 3-yr-old iMac with  
Mathematica 8.0.1 (64-bit).

Bobby

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:24:42 -0500, a evans <aeospam at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I would be grateful if someone could help me to understand why my  
> $MaxNumber is seemingly much lower than it should be. I am running  
> modern equipment (quad-core 64bit) with windows 7 64-bit and Mathematica  
> 8.0. The $MaxNumber according to my machine is :  
> 1.233433712981650*10^323228458. According to reports at the URL below  
> the $MaxNumber on 64-bit machines in Mathematica 6.0 is up to  
> 2.093117322269914*10^646456781. This is also the number given in the  
> wolfram documentation. Any information on how to resolve this I would  
> kindly appreciate.
>
>  http://www.mathkb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/mathematica/11731/What-is-MaxNumber-on-a-64-bit-Computer
>
> Many regards,
>
> Arthur
>


-- 
DrMajorBob at yahoo.com


  • Prev by Date: Export bsplinesurface as nurbs-import into Rhino
  • Next by Date: Re: Question on Unevaluated
  • Previous by thread: $MaxNumber
  • Next by thread: Re: $MaxNumber