MathGroup Archive 2012

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Terrible unit trouble in Mathematic 9

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg129170] Re: Terrible unit trouble in Mathematic 9
  • From: David Reiss <dbreiss at gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 04:58:51 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <kap6c4$469$1@smc.vnet.net>

You need to get both the syntax right as well as the names of the
units (which are strings).  E.g.,

UnitConvert[Quantity[55 , "Miles"/"Hours"],
Quantity["Meters"/"Seconds"]]

Go back and spend a bit of time reviewing the documentation and
working through the examples for the functions that are contained in
the documentation....  ;-)

--David


On Dec 18, 2:35 am, tio54... at gmail.com wrote:
> I continue to receive "Unable to interpret unit specification m/s" (for e=
xample, but almost anything I attempt returns this message) with input:
> UnitConvert[55 mi/h,"m/s"] or UnitConvert[55 mi/h,m/s] or any other combi=
nation of quotes, omitted quotes, etc. Even the prediction/suggestion box, =
when I execute Quantity[55,"mi/hour"}, after it returns 55 mi/h, if I type =
in any combination of m/s, "m"/"s", "m/s", etc. into the box that opens whe=
n I select "Convert" in the prediction box yields the same "unable to inter=
pret unit specification.
>
> What the heck????




  • Prev by Date: Re: Plot Points over an image
  • Next by Date: Re: Programmatically specifying parameters in "Manipulate" command
  • Previous by thread: Re: Terrible unit trouble in Mathematic 9
  • Next by thread: Re: Terrible unit trouble in Mathematic 9