Re: Stylesheet for input side by side with output
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg128271] Re: Stylesheet for input side by side with output
- From: David Reiss <dbreiss at gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 03:08:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <20120923070153.D9CA26877@smc.vnet.net> <k466qk$a8c$1@smc.vnet.net>
By the way, the part that I didn't put in the margin is that, for the
approach I am suggesting, the resulting input will no longer be
executable. One cold add a button to the Cell's "ornamentation" to
toggle back to the original top to bottom linear layout....
--David
On Sep 29, 3:10 am, Brentt <brenttnew... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you, I was thinking it could probably be done if I got down and dirty
> with some notebook programming. As for the margins, I'm thinking it would
> work well for doing scratch calculations, as in those times I usually have
> a lot of real estate on the right and find myself wanting to look at
> results and input separately.
>
> Fermat was proven correct in two respects I suppose: the theorem is
> (apparently) correct, and there actually wasn't enough room in the margins
> for the proof.
>
> Fermat was proved correct in two respects: that proof really couldn't have
> fit in the margins.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Brentt <brenttnew... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the suggestions :)
>
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:12 AM, christopher arthur <
> > chris.arth... at gmail.com
> > > wrote:
>
> > > You could use authortools "makebilateralcells" afterwards...but it
> > > wouldn't be automatic.
>
> > > Brentt a =E9crit :
> > > > Hi, is there a way to make input on the left side of the screen, and
> > then
> > > > output appear on the right side of the screen? For example instead of
> > the
> > > > default notebook style
>
> > > > Input[n]: foo
> > > > Output[m]: bar
>
> > > > have
>
> > > > Input[n]: foo |
Output[m]: bar
>
> > > > where there is some sort of split screen type divider. Seems to me like
> > > it
> > > > would be a nicer way to work.