Re: A new FrontEnd
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg127953] Re: A new FrontEnd
- From: Murta <rodrigomurtax at gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 03:07:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <k21kj2$9vq$1@smc.vnet.net> <k24im7$1in$1@smc.vnet.net>
Point that Wolfram could improve.
1- More Undo! (1 Undo is a shame)
2- A decent debugger (don't tell me to use Workbench, I don't want to lose my 2D interface).
3- Riches graphics pallet. (Try to plot Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 10}, PlotLabel -> "Test"], and change the label position or size..!.. it isn't friendly)
On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 6:47:54 AM UTC-3, psycho_dad wrote:
> No thank you, I prefer Mathematica the way it is for many reasons:
>
> 1) New interfaces tend to have bugs and with Wolfram's history of dealing with bugs it might take a couple of versions to fix them all.
>
> 2) There might be incompatibility issues with older code. I routinely use code I wrote back in 2005 and it still works.
>
> 3) The FrontEnd in Mathematica 8 is *not* archaic but it's just perfect for what's supposed to be, ie a notebook interface.
>
> 4) If something ain't broke, don't fix it!
>
>
>
> However, now that I think about it, I would indeed like tabs instead of separate windows for my notebooks.
>
>
>
> Cheers