MathGroup Archive 2014

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: How to avoid repeated recalculation of the same function

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg132677] Re: How to avoid repeated recalculation of the same function
  • From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
  • Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 03:41:15 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20140502061856.7A2216A46@smc.vnet.net>

Did you try using Set ( = ) instead of SetDelayed ( := ) when defining f?  That is, try:

   f[x_] = expression


On May 2, 2014, at 2:18 AM, pgeipi10 at gmail.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm doing a calculaton that's purly symbolic (no graphing, numerical integration, etc.).
>
> Suppose I have a function f[x_]:=... that's very complex to build. In fact, f[x] ends up being a manageable expression (about 30 characters) but it takes Mathematica about 30 min to build that expression.
>
> Another function g[] uses the function f[x] and references it many times. I've discovered that g[] actually builds f[x] every time it's referenced which takes 30 minutes each time. Theoretically, Mathematica could build it once and then use the resulting expression every time it's referenced.
>
> So how do I accomplish that? That is, how do I make it build f[x] once and then use the resulting expression when it's needed?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Pavel
>

Murray Eisenberg                                murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.      
Lederle Graduate Research Tower      phone 240 246-7240 (H)
University of Massachusetts               
710 North Pleasant Street                
Amherst, MA 01003-9305









  • Prev by Date: Re: Plotting Data By State
  • Next by Date: Re: How to avoid repeated recalculation of the same
  • Previous by thread: Re: How to avoid repeated recalculation of the same function
  • Next by thread: Re: How to avoid repeated recalculation of the same