|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg4053] Re: [mg4017] SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D
- From: xah at best.com (Xah Lee)
- Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 02:48:13 -0400
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
At 2:12 AM 96/5/20, Elizabeth J Earhart wrote:
>Is there a way to combine SurfaceGraphics and Graphics3D objects?
>
>-Elizabeth Earhart
Just change SurfaceGraphics object into a Graphics3D object like this
Graphics3D[ % ]
where % is your SurfaceGraphics object. Then you can use Show to display
them both.
Xah
xah at best.com; 74631.731 at compuserve.com
http://www.best.com/~xah/SpecialPlaneCurves_dir/specialPlaneCurves.html
Mountain View, CA, USA
PS by the time I finished writing this email, I saw Ian already replied in
Mathgroup. Anyway, I decided to send it with this piece of extra
information: There's a free real-time 3D visualization tool for the Mac
that can be used with Mathematica. Get more info on my plane curve site,
About Mathematica section.
==== [MESSAGE SEPARATOR] ====
Prev by Date:
BitMaps and Mathematica
Next by Date:
Numerical Evaluation of Sqrt[]
Previous by thread:
Re: SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D
Next by thread:
Re: SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D
|