Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1996
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1996

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg4051] Re: [mg4017] SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D
  • From: Allan Hayes <hay at haystack.demon.co.uk>
  • Date: Thu, 30 May 1996 02:47:52 -0400
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

earhart at athena.mit.edu (Elizabeth J Earhart)
>Subject: [mg4017] SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D
asks

Is there a way to combine SurfaceGraphics and Graphics3D objects?

Elizabeth:
Show will do it:try

sg = Plot3D[Sin[x + y],{x,0,2Pi},{y,0,2Pi}]
g3d1 = ParametricPlot3D[{x,Pi+Cos[y],Sin[y]},{x,0,2Pi},{y,0,2Pi}]
g3d2 = ParametricPlot3D[{Pi,y,Sin[y],{Hue[0],Thickness[.03]}},{y,0,2Pi}]

Show[sg,g3d1, g3d2]

Allan Hayes
hay at haystack.demon.co.uk


==== [MESSAGE SEPARATOR] ====


  • Prev by Date: Error Tracing - NDSolve
  • Next by Date: Re: Beginner-type question
  • Previous by thread: Re: SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D
  • Next by thread: Re: SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D