Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1996
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1996

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg4078] Re: [mg4017] SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D
  • From: earhart at athena.mit.edu (Elizabeth J Earhart)
  • Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 01:34:57 -0400
  • Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Thanks to all who responded to this query.  It turned out that I was
using the correct method for combining the graphs, but that there
was a problem with my ListPlot3D statement, and it was returning
the string "-Surface Graphics-" instead of an actual SurfaceGraphics
object, and I wasn't noticing the difference because I had
DisplayFunction->Identity in the uncombined graphs.

-Elizabeth Earhart


==== [MESSAGE SEPARATOR] ====


  • Prev by Date: Mathematica integer vs floating point characteristics
  • Next by Date: Re: Numerical Evaluation of Sqrt[]
  • Previous by thread: Re: SurfaceGraphics vs. Graphics3D
  • Next by thread: Need help exporting PostScript plots