Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
MathGroup Archive
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1996

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: ComplexExpand

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg5318] Re: [mg5302] ComplexExpand
  • From: Sherman Reed <Sherman.Reed at>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 01:47:35 -0500
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

At 06:44 AM 11/23/96 +0000, you wrote:
>Can anyone explain to me why the following two
>examples behave differently? Thanks.
>Mathematica 2.2 for IBM RISC System/6000
>Copyright 1988-93 Wolfram Research, Inc.
> -- Terminal graphics initialized --
>In[1]:= ComplexExpand[Log[1 / E^x]]
>Out[1]= -x
>In[2]:= ComplexExpand[Log[1 / (2 E^x)]]
>             1
>Out[2]= Log[----]
>               x
>            2 E

I get the same result when using 2.2.3 on Pent 166 w/32 mb ram.

however when I do the exercise on 3.0 on Pent 155 w/32 mb ram, I get


which is what I would expect.  I cannot explain why, however.  I get the same
result on a NeXT using 2.2

Sherman Reed

  • Prev by Date: Re: Mathematica: Weibull distribution fnc.
  • Next by Date: mathematica 3.0 notebook problems?
  • Previous by thread: Re: ComplexExpand
  • Next by thread: Re: ComplexExpand