|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: trig expansion
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg9323] Re: trig expansion
- From: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 02:47:39 -0500
- Organization: University of Western Australia
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> I find that really unpleasant to have to do! I expect to be able to
> tell Mathematica that T = k/omega and that k is an integer and have
> *Mathematica* figure out what the Sin and Cos reduce to.
>
> It's all a question of expectation vs. reality of the language design,
> of course. Is my expectation unreasonable?
Let me ask another (related) question. If you enter
BesselJ[n+1/2,x]
for k an integer what do you expect Mathematica to return? My point is
that closed-form formulas exist as a consequence of n being an integer.
How far through the system do you expect this functionality to extend?
Cheers,
Paul
____________________________________________________________________
Paul Abbott Phone: +61-8-9380-2734
Department of Physics Fax: +61-8-9380-1014
The University of Western Australia Nedlands WA 6907
mailto:paul at physics.uwa.edu.au AUSTRALIA
http://www.pd.uwa.edu.au/~paul
God IS a weakly left-handed dice player
____________________________________________________________________
Prev by Date:
How to display *.bmp image in notebook?
Next by Date:
Line Breaking/Word Wrapping in Mathematica?
Previous by thread:
Re: trig expansion
Next by thread:
a[[2]][[3]] = 1 error? why?
|