Re: FullSimplify results
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg12830] Re: [mg12800] FullSimplify results
- From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 18:15:08 -0400
- References: <199806120805.EAA24516@smc.vnet.net.>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
>The online help ComplexityFunction has corrections to treat >integers with more digits as more complex. I haven't come up >with a case where that would be relevant. If anyone can come >up with an example please let me know. "Better" is in the eyes of the beholder. That said, here is the sort of example we have in mind. In[1]:= ee = Log[10^100]; In[2]:= FullSimplify[ee] Out[2]= 100 Log[10] In[4]:= FullSimplify[ee, ComplexityFunction->LeafCount] Out[4]= Log[10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\ > 000000000000000000000000000000000000] As for conversion of exponentials to trigs/hyperbolics...sometimes various conversions are tried and retained, when the complexity function is a tie, according to a heuristic hierarchy that suggests when further simplifications may be more likely. Daniel Lichtblau Wolfram Research
- References:
- FullSimplify results
- From: Ersek_Ted%PAX1A@mr.nawcad.navy.mil
- FullSimplify results