Re: Strange results
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg14428] Re: [mg14404] Strange results
- From: Garrett Tim Sos <gts at mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 03:32:24 -0400
- References: <199810181910.PAA02298@smc.vnet.net.>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
With several instructions are in a single cell, sometimes Mathematica assumes a multiply between one line and the next. This can cause wired results or unexpected errors. A ; at the end of a line always forces a break -- However, does not echo output. If this is undersireable, try surounding the line with ( ). This always fixes a problem with some typeset intergrals getting confused with the next line - and retained the output. I asked WR if there was a break that still produces output like a special form of ; - They said no. I would vote that this should get into a newer release. Tim Laurence Lours wrote: > > Dear Mathgroup, > > I have different results when I use one cell with a lot of instructions > in it, rather than dividing the cell to have unique instructions in > each. The good results are calculated when I use the second solution. > Did somebody have the same problem? > > I am using Mathematica 3.02 on SPARC > > Laurence Lours > lours at bruyeres.cea.fr
- References:
- Strange results
- From: Laurence Lours <lours@bruyeres.cea.fr>
- Strange results