Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
1998
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 1998

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Strange results

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg14428] Re: [mg14404] Strange results
  • From: Garrett Tim Sos <gts at mindspring.com>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 03:32:24 -0400
  • References: <199810181910.PAA02298@smc.vnet.net.>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

With several instructions are in a single cell, sometimes Mathematica
assumes a multiply between one line and the next.  This can cause wired
results or unexpected errors.  A ; at the end of a line always forces a
break -- However, does not echo output. If this is undersireable, try
surounding the line  with ( ).  This always fixes a problem with some
typeset intergrals getting confused with the next line - and retained
the output.

I asked WR if there was a break that still produces output like a
special form of ; - They said no.

I would vote that this should get into a newer release.

Tim  


Laurence Lours wrote:
> 
> Dear Mathgroup,
> 
> I have different results when I use one cell with a lot of instructions
> in it,  rather than dividing the cell to have unique instructions in
> each. The good  results are calculated when I use the second solution.
> Did somebody have the  same problem?
> 
> I am using Mathematica 3.02 on SPARC
> 
> Laurence Lours
> lours at bruyeres.cea.fr


  • Prev by Date: Re: Plot, Cursor and Spelling Errors questions
  • Next by Date: Importing Dos Data into Linux Mathematica?
  • Previous by thread: Strange results
  • Next by thread: FactorInteger