Re: "At long last, Sir, have you no shame?"
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg18524] Re: "At long last, Sir, have you no shame?"
- From: colin at tri.org.au (Colin Rose)
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 22:32:57 -0400
- Organization: Theoretical Research Institute
- References: <7luk6s$l95@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
David Withoff <withoff at wolfram.com> wrote: > independent experts often disagree about what is or is not a bug. Two cases instantly come to mind: 1. Sum in v4 _________ Consider say: In[1]:= g = Exp[-i]; In[2]:= Sum[g, {i, 1, n}] Out[2]= n/E^i which is nonsense. This happens for almost ANY expression g=g(i). To get the correct answer, you have to wrap Evaluate around g: In[3]:= Sum[Evaluate[g], {i, 1, n}] Out[3]= (-1 + E^n)/(E^n*(-1 + E)) Wolfram support says Out[2] is not a bug, since Sum has attribute HoldAll. I say it is clearly (and obviously) an extremely serious bug, in the sense that it gives the wrong answer to almost any Summation where g is pre-defined. I reported it under v4 alpha, it was fixed in the betas, and it is now back in the v4 final release. But then it isn't a bug, apparently !? 2. Non-convergent integrals ________________________ Or how about the mean of a Cauchy random variable: In[1]:= f = 1/(Pi(1 + x^2)); In[2]:= Integrate[x*f, {x, -Infinity, Infinity}, GenerateConditions -> False] Out[2]= I The correct answer is that the integral does not converge. WRI claims it is not a bug, and won't fix it, even though: (i) GenerateConditions -> True yields the correct answer (convergence error), and (ii) there are no conditions stated here anyway, so it is not apparent why GenerateConditions -> False should yield a different solution to -> True. This is actually a general problem, with similar behaviour in the Levy family, f = (1/Sqrt[2*Pi]*Exp[-(1/(2*y))])/y^(3/2); where the moments do not exist either. ___________ Cheers Colin -- Colin Rose tr(I) - Theoretical Research Institute __________________________________________ colin at tri.org.au http://www.tri.org.au/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: "At long last, Sir, have you no shame?"
- From: "Kevin J. McCann" <kevinmccann@Home.com>
- Re: Re: "At long last, Sir, have you no shame?"