MathGroup Archive 2000

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

AW: pure functions

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg23285] AW: [mg23237] pure functions
  • From: Klamser at (Peter Klamser)
  • Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:13:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • Disposition-notification-to: "Peter Klamser" <>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at



exli$t = Transpose[exli]

MapThread[(#1 + #2) &, exli$t, 1]

Regrads, Peter Klamser

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Helge Andersson [mailto:helgea at]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. April 2000 04:05
An: mathgroup at
Betreff: [mg23237] pure functions


Of all the nice functions such as Map, Mapall, Thread, Apply .... I have
not been able to write a simple code to generate the following

I have a two dimensional list like


Since i like to use the pure function command I would like to map my
pure function with arguments #1,#2,#3,.... on all the sublists in li.

Let me exemplify with a simple pure function that add to numbers.

if exli={{1,2},{3,4},{5,6},{7,8}}

then I want to get the result

One solution, but not allways suitable for me, is the following

(#1+#2)&[Sequence @@ Transpose[exli]].

I want to get rid of the Transpose command and if possible also making
use of the /@ notation for Map. Since I have seen so many elegant
examples in the mailing lists I hope  I can get something out of this.

Finally, When using pure functions inside Mathematica defined functions
such as Select for instance,
why don't we need to specify the argument list after the &sign. I can
figure out that in this case the list sent to the Select command will be
used as argument list for the pure function but how does this work in
general. Which are the functions where this feature is possible?


Helge Andersson
Oorganisk miljökemi
412 96 Göteborg

Tel. 031-772 8072
Tel. Lab. 031-55 38 67
Fax  031-772 28 53

  • Prev by Date: Re: Problem with Plot and Ticks-function
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Please help with a Hypergeometric2F1 problem...
  • Previous by thread: [Q] Equation solving?
  • Next by thread: Re: Generating Random Values with Do[]