|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Associated Legendre Definition
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg25668] Re: [mg25613] Associated Legendre Definition
- From: BobHanlon at aol.com
- Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:52:36 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In a message dated 10/16/2000 3:28:00 AM, pmib at my-deja.com writes:
>In Mathematica, the associated Legendre polynomial is defined as
>
>P(n,m,x) = (-1)^m (1-x^2)^(m/2) d^m/dx^m (P(n,x))
>
>while in Schaum's Outlines 'Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and
>tables' it is defined as
>
>P(n,m,x) = (1-x^2)^(m/2) d^m/dx^m (P(n,x))
>
>What is true (or doesn't it matter)?
>
Many special functions have multiple definitions with slight variations. The
definition which Mathematica uses is the same as that used in Abramowitz and
Stegun (8.6.6) and in Gradshteyn and Ryzhik (8.752.1).
Bob Hanlon
Prev by Date:
Re: careers with mathematica?
Next by Date:
Re: Associated Legendre Definition
Previous by thread:
Associated Legendre Definition
Next by thread:
Re: Associated Legendre Definition
|