[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Is this a bug?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg32057] Re: [mg32047] Is this a bug?
*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at tuins.ac.jp>
*Date*: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 03:57:26 -0500 (EST)
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
No, there is no bug here. If you think carefully about the evaluation
chain you will see that k[5] has two be evaluated twice-at least.
Increment[a[k[5]] has to compute the value of a[0]=a[k[5]](first
time) , add one to it and assign it to a[0]=a[k[5]] (second time) then
return the old value. The last step does not require computing k[5]
again because Increment remembers it. This saves you one evaluation of
k[5] (and one "hallo world") compared with the following code which
otherwise does the same thing:
In[22]:=
(a[k[5]]=a[k[5]]+1;a[k[5]]-1)
In[22]:=
hallo world
hallo world
hallo world
Out[22]=
0
You see that this time "hallo world" was printed three times. The
difference is that Increment remembers the "old value" so it does not
need to compute it again.
Andrzej Kozlowski
Toyama International University
JAPAN
http://platon.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/andrzej/
On Thursday, December 20, 2001, at 05:42 PM, Paul van Wamelen wrote:
> Is the following a bug?
>
> Mathematica 4.1 for Sun Solaris
> Copyright 1988-2000 Wolfram Research, Inc.
> -- Motif graphics initialized --
>
> In[1]:= k[x_] := Module[{},Print["hallo world"];x];
>
> In[2]:= a[5] = 0;
>
> In[3]:= a[k[5]]++
> hallo world
> hallo world
>
> Out[3]= 0
>
>
> I would have expected only one "hallo world" and it would seem to be
> more efficient to only evaluate the k[5] once...
>
> The above example is not important but in the form below it had me
> baffled for a while:
>
> In[4]:= tst[n_] := Module[{a},
> a[0] = a[1] = 0;
> Do[a[Random[Integer,{0,1}]]++,{n}];
> {a[0],a[1]}]
>
> In[5]:= tst[50]
>
> Out[5]= {24, 24}
>
> (Does not add up to 50!)
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
Prev by Date:
**Re: Is this a bug?**
Next by Date:
**Re: Bump Function**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Is this a bug?**
Next by thread:
**Re: Is this a bug?**
| |