|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Random Sampling Without Replacement?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg26632] Re: Random Sampling Without Replacement?
- From: "Hermann Meier" <hmeier at webshuttle.ch>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 22:36:11 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: EUnet AG, Switzerland. A KPNQwest Company.
- References: <93edpc$cn@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
"A. E. Siegman" <siegman at stanford.edu> wrote in message
news:93edpc$cn at smc.vnet.net...
> Looking for neat compact way to extract three distinct (i.e., nonequal)
> randomly selected integers k1, k2, k3 from the range 1 to N (N > 3) --
> in other words, random sampling without replacement -- ???
According to D. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 2, 3rd ed.,
Ch. 3.4.2, exercise 16, and D. Ripley, Stochastic Simulation, p. 80,
the following simple code also works:
{nn, n} = {52, 3};
result = {};
While[Length[result] < n,
result = Union[Append[result, Random[Integer, {1, nn}]]]];
result
With best regards
Hermann Meier
Prev by Date:
erratum in OnLineHelp & TheBook
Next by Date:
Re: Re: Random Sampling Without Replacement?
Previous by thread:
Re: Random Sampling Without Replacement?
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Random Sampling Without Replacement?
|