Re: FORTRAN style, not OK?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg26893] Re: FORTRAN style, not OK?
- From: "Paul Lutus" <nospam at nosite.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 23:29:41 -0500 (EST)
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <AWQb6.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
"Jens-Peer Kuska" <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote in message
news:94r611$ibi at smc.vnet.net...
> > In:=
> > v = 5
> > c = 2
> > v = v - c
> > Out= 5
> > Out= 2
> > Out= 3
> > Whatever the problem is, it is not Mathematica's own syntax. Why not
> > more closely at what your code does?
> > --
> > Paul Lutus
> > www.arachnoid.com
> the problem is, that v is a function call and *not* a
> reference to a variable. So
> define a recusion and not a reference to a value in a list
> like v[[i]].
> *And* that v[i] is a function call is a "problem" of
> Mathematica's syntax.
> The true problem is that Toshiyuki Meshii try
> to use function values as arrays because FORTRAN's
> syntax make no difference between A(i,j) as an array
> reference *or* as an function call.
Darn! I should have noticed that. Too bad, I've programmed in C++ so much --
that prevented my seeing this obvious error.
Prev by Date:
Next by Date:
Mathematica 4.1 + Linux + gnome/sawfish
Previous by thread:
Re: Fw: FORTRAN style, not OK?
Next by thread:
Fw: Compiling a function using Module